The Government and Media Shares Shame Game
Sentinel; Los Angeles, Calif. › August 21, 2009
Linked as:
Sentinel; Los Angeles, Calif. › August 21, 2009
Linked as:Summary
The problem is that the government does not play by its own rules and as indicative in the [Barry Bonds] case, they lied to witnesses to get information from Bonds, but surprisingly Bonds and his high profile attorneys did not realize that many of the questions they were asking him they already had the answers for.
This shame game is not just exclusive to Bonds or Major League Baseball, which initiated this investigation into steroids to begin with, this shame game is equally shared by the American Government which takes tax payers money and do what it damn well pleases and then tells us what we should do with our money.Barry Bonds was an exceptional baseball player years before he was accused and then admitted that he took steroids. While the common response has befen that the "cream" or "clear" does not help hit a baseball farther-that too is now debatable and there is unmitigated evidence to the contrary.The pecking order of prominent Black athletes to be prosecuted by the Federal Government has reached to the doorsteps of the all-time home run king in baseball-Barry Bonds.See the full content of this document
Extract
The Government and Media Shares Shame Game
The pecking order of prominent Black athletes to be prosecuted by the Federal Government has reached to the doorsteps of the all-time home run king in baseball-Barry Bonds.
Reminiscent...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
For Love of Vulgarity | Westside / the Questions | A Solemn Start to School Pike Central High School Students Gathered Wednesday to Remember Three of Their Own | Police Suspect Same Man in String of Cvs Robberies | Sentencia nº 2829 de Consiglio di Stato May 28 2008 | Sentencia nº 1418 de Consiglio di Stato March 11 2008 | Sentencia nº 166 de Consiglio di Stato January 13 2009 | Sentencia nº 695 de Consiglio di Stato, February 10, 2010